GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.70

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking426184
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.78
ArchitectureXe LPGAmpere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179
Current priceno data$204 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42304
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−180%
70−75
+180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−194%
45−50
+194%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−213%
50
+213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−194%
45−50
+194%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−210%
31
+210%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−194%
45−50
+194%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−200%
30
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 180% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.70 27.88
Recency 14 December 2023 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 420 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.