Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4080

Place in performance ranking	3	326
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.31	no data
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3
GPU code name	AD103-300-A1	Phoenix
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 September 2022 (1 year ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$1451 (1.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9728	512
Core clock speed	2205 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	2800 MHz
Number of transistors	45,900 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	761.5	67.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 4080 and Radeon 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	310 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	22400 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	716.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 89.61
+486%

Radeon 760M 15.30

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon 760M by 486% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4080 34611
+486%

Radeon 760M 5911

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon 760M by 486% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4080 86267
+798%

Radeon 760M 9603

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon 760M by 798% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4080 143194
+334%

Radeon 760M 32985

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon 760M by 334% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4080 57903
+843%

Radeon 760M 6142

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon 760M by 843% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4080 185431
+344%

Radeon 760M 41767

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon 760M by 344% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	243 +684%	31 −684%
1440p	174 +544%	27−30 −544%
4K	112 +522%	18−20 −522%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

231

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	262	no data
Battlefield 5	240−250	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	231	no data
Far Cry 5	110−120	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210	no data
Forza Horizon 4	270−280	no data
Hitman 3	120−130	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	478	no data
Metro Exodus	150−160	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	527	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	191	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	217	no data
Battlefield 5	240−250	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	210	no data
Far Cry 5	110−120	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210	no data
Forza Horizon 4	270−280	no data
Hitman 3	120−130	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400	no data
Metro Exodus	83	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	512	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	545	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	189	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	190	no data
Far Cry 5	110−120	no data
Forza Horizon 4	270−280	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	396	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	480	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	259	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	164	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	153	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	129	no data
Far Cry 5	201	no data
Forza Horizon 4	240−250	no data
Hitman 3	130−140	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	332	no data
Metro Exodus	149	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	390	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	191	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	142	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Hitman 3	80−85	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	187	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	63	no data
Far Cry 5	50−55	no data
Forza Horizon 4	190−200	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	201	no data
Metro Exodus	130	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	87	no data