GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon 760M

Place in the ranking	356	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.21
Power efficiency	68.26	20.00
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Hawx Point	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	8448
Core clock speed	800 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	2599 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	25,390 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	83.17	689.0
Floating-point processing power	5.323 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	32	264
Tensor Cores	no data	264
Ray Tracing Cores	8	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 14.84

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.60
+457%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5707

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31759
+456%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 760M 9603

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 74834
+679%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 760M 6142

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 54566
+788%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 760M 41767

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 165604
+296%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	31 −629%	226 +629%
1440p	19 −726%	157 +726%
4K	16−18 −500%	96 +500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.54
1440p	no data	5.09
4K	no data	8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	25 −656%	189 +656%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −433%	160−170 +433%
Elden Ring	45−50 −629%	300−350 +629%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −144%	110−120 +144%
Counter-Strike 2	19 −895%	189 +895%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −442%	65−70 +442%
Forza Horizon 4	51 −816%	467 +816%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −303%	160−170 +303%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −331%	150−160 +331%
Valorant	55−60 −736%	450−500 +736%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −144%	110−120 +144%
Counter-Strike 2	18 −850%	171 +850%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −456%	50−55 +456%
Dota 2	23 −657%	174 +657%
Elden Ring	45−50 −629%	300−350 +629%
Far Cry 5	29 −417%	150 +417%
Fortnite	80−85 −271%	300−350 +271%
Forza Horizon 4	44 −905%	442 +905%
Grand Theft Auto V	34 −412%	174 +412%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −97.5%	79 +97.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −101%	210−220 +101%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −331%	150−160 +331%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −287%	170−180 +287%
Valorant	55−60 −736%	450−500 +736%
World of Tanks	190−200 −45.3%	270−280 +45.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −144%	110−120 +144%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −477%	150 +477%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −452%	160−170 +452%
Dota 2	50−55 −447%	290−300 +447%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −185%	150−160 +185%
Forza Horizon 4	37 −1000%	407 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −101%	210−220 +101%
Valorant	55−60 −736%	450−500 +736%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −638%	155 +638%
Elden Ring	21−24 −943%	240−250 +943%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −605%	155 +605%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −33.6%	170−180 +33.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −615%	90−95 +615%
World of Tanks	100−110 −396%	500−550 +396%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −190%	85−90 +190%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −631%	95 +631%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −445%	60−65 +445%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −750%	306 +750%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −344%	140−150 +344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −737%	159 +737%
Valorant	35−40 −1003%	400−450 +1003%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −260%	36 +260%
Dota 2	24−27 −600%	182 +600%
Elden Ring	10−11 −1240%	130−140 +1240%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −600%	182 +600%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −740%	84 +740%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −375%	200−210 +375%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −611%	60−65 +611%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −600%	182 +600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −550%	90−95 +550%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1010%	110−120 +1010%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Dota 2	24−27 −438%	140−150 +438%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −453%	100−110 +453%
Fortnite	16−18 −465%	95−100 +465%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −671%	162 +671%
Valorant	16−18 −1394%	230−240 +1394%