GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Place in performance ranking	6	184
Place by popularity	not in top-100	45
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	30.37	37.76
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	AD103-275	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)	2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$179
Current price	$820 (1x MSRP)	$204 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 6 GB has 24% better value for money than RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8448	2304
Core clock speed	2340 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	1470 MHz
Number of transistors	45,900 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	285 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	689.0	105.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	310 mm	242 mm
Width	3-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	21000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	716.8 GB/s	168.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.10
+194%

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.88

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31703
+194%

RTX 3050 6 GB 10767

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by 194% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	216 +209%	70−75 −209%
1440p	150 +200%	50−55 −200%
4K	92 +207%	30−35 −207%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	350−400 +167%	130−140 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	400−450 +168%	140−150 −168%
Battlefield 5	700−750 +187%	240−250 −187%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	350−400 +192%	120−130 −192%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +154%	110−120 −154%
Far Cry New Dawn	550−600 +174%	200−210 −174%
Forza Horizon 4	700−750 +179%	250−260 −179%
Hitman 3	350−400 +185%	120−130 −185%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1000−1050 +188%	300−350 −188%
Metro Exodus	400−450 +168%	140−150 −168%
Red Dead Redemption 2	350−400 +182%	120−130 −182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1350−1400 +189%	467 −189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	500−550 +192%	171 −192%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	350−400 +167%	130−140 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	400−450 +168%	140−150 −168%
Battlefield 5	700−750 +187%	240−250 −187%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	350−400 +192%	120−130 −192%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +154%	110−120 −154%
Far Cry New Dawn	550−600 +174%	200−210 −174%
Forza Horizon 4	700−750 +179%	250−260 −179%
Hitman 3	350−400 +185%	120−130 −185%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1000−1050 +188%	300−350 −188%
Metro Exodus	400−450 +168%	140−150 −168%
Red Dead Redemption 2	350−400 +182%	120−130 −182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1300−1350 +194%	442 −194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1250−1300 +191%	430 −191%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +176%	140−150 −176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	350−400 +167%	130−140 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	400−450 +168%	140−150 −168%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	350−400 +192%	120−130 −192%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +154%	110−120 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	700−750 +179%	250−260 −179%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1000−1050 +188%	300−350 −188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1150−1200 +183%	407 −183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	600−650 +186%	210 −186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +178%	144 −178%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

350−400
+182%

120−130

−182%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	450−500 +171%	160−170 −171%
Far Cry New Dawn	400−450 +178%	140−150 −178%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	290−300 +193%	95−100 −193%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	300−310 +178%	100−110 −178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +168%	110−120 −168%
Far Cry 5	550−600 +194%	187 −194%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +183%	210−220 −183%
Hitman 3	350−400 +192%	120−130 −192%
Horizon Zero Dawn	650−700 +191%	220−230 −191%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +173%	120−130 −173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	900−950 +194%	306 −194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	450−500 +183%	159 −183%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +159%	116 −159%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

350−400
+178%

120−130

−178%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	250−260 +184%	85−90 −184%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +190%	65−70 −190%
Hitman 3	220−230 +189%	75−80 −189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	400−450 +194%	130−140 −194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +173%	110 −173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +167%	130−140 −167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	210−220 +192%	70−75 −192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	200−210 +190%	65−70 −190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +188%	50−55 −188%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +180%	50−55 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	450−500 +173%	160−170 −173%
Horizon Zero Dawn	400−450 +194%	130−140 −194%
Metro Exodus	290−300 +187%	100−110 −187%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +190%	69 −190%