RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX 4060 Ti 16G
2023
16 GB GDDR6
49.46
+4.5%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by a small 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5563
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.63no data
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
GPU code nameAD106AD107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 May 2023 (less than a year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649
Current price$500 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43522816
Core clock speed2310 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2535 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD171
+6.9%
160−170
−6.9%
1440p92
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
4K54
+8%
50−55
−8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 176
+10%
160−170
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+12.5%
120−130
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
Far Cry 5 191
+6.1%
180−190
−6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 160
+6.7%
150−160
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Hitman 3 150−160
+5.3%
150−160
−5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+7%
100−105
−7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 224
+6.7%
210−220
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+12.5%
120−130
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%
Far Cry 5 182
+7.1%
170−180
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 154
+10%
140−150
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Hitman 3 150−160
+5.3%
150−160
−5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+7%
100−105
−7%
Metro Exodus 130
+8.3%
120−130
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+7.2%
180−190
−7.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 270
+8%
250−260
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+8.4%
95−100
−8.4%
Far Cry 5 171
+6.9%
160−170
−6.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+10%
120−130
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Hitman 3 95−100
+10%
90−95
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Metro Exodus 79
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Far Cry 5 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+7%
100−105
−7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Hitman 3 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Metro Exodus 48
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16G and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.46 47.32
Recency 18 May 2023 12 February 2024

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 504 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 5 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.