GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G vs RTX 4060

Place in performance ranking	51	55
Place by popularity	4	90
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.90	30.60
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	AD107	AD106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (less than a year ago)	18 May 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data
Current price	$340 (1.1x MSRP)	$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 has 53% better value for money than RTX 4060 Ti 16G.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	4352
Core clock speed	1830 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	2460 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	35,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	236.2	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	17000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	272.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_2
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	no data
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 50.62
+2.3%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 49.46

RTX 4060 outperforms RTX 4060 Ti 16G by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4060 107451

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 116054
+8%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms RTX 4060 by 8% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4060 38191

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 43112
+12.9%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms RTX 4060 by 13% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4060 28111

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 32275
+14.8%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms RTX 4060 by 15% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4060 156140

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 165263
+5.8%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms RTX 4060 by 6% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 4060 769721
+28.1%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 600933

RTX 4060 outperforms RTX 4060 Ti 16G by 28% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	145 −17.9%	171 +17.9%
1440p	73 −26%	92 +26%
4K	44 −22.7%	54 +22.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

139

−26.6%

176
+26.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +1.2%	80−85 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +2.3%	85−90 −2.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +2.2%	130−140 −2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	107 −28%	137 +28%
Far Cry 5	185 −3.2%	191 +3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	165 +3.1%	160 −3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
Hitman 3	160−170 +2.5%	150−160 −2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 −22.4%	224 +22.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1.1%	85−90 −1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +1.2%	80−85 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +2.3%	85−90 −2.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +2.2%	130−140 −2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	90 −27.8%	115 +27.8%
Far Cry 5	172 −5.8%	182 +5.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	156 +1.3%	154 −1.3%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
Hitman 3	160−170 +2.5%	150−160 −2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
Metro Exodus	107 −21.5%	130 +21.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	156 −23.7%	193 +23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	215 −25.6%	270 +25.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1.1%	85−90 −1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +1.2%	80−85 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +2.3%	85−90 −2.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 −28.8%	103 +28.8%
Far Cry 5	162 −5.6%	171 +5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	139 +1.5%	137 −1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	112 −17.9%	132 +17.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1.1%	85−90 −1.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +2.3%	85−90 −2.3%
Hitman 3	100−110 +3%	95−100 −3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +2.7%	70−75 −2.7%
Metro Exodus	63 −25.4%	79 +25.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +2.4%	40−45 −2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	96 −25%	120 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +3.5%	55−60 −3.5%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +2%	95−100 −2%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 −29.2%	62 +29.2%
Far Cry 5	110 −15.5%	127 +15.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	111 −7.2%	119 +7.2%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −18.5%	96 +18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +2.1%	45−50 −2.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +4.1%	45−50 −4.1%
Hitman 3	55−60 +3.8%	50−55 −3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Metro Exodus	38 −26.3%	48 +26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	46 −28.3%	59 +28.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 −16.2%	79 +16.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +1.6%	60−65 −1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 −35%	27 +35%
Far Cry 5	55 −18.2%	65 +18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 −15.5%	67 +15.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +2.8%	70−75 −2.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%

This is how RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti 16G compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 17.9% faster than RTX 4060 in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 26% faster than RTX 4060 in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 22.7% faster than RTX 4060 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 is 4.1% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti 16G.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 35% faster than the RTX 4060.

All in all, in popular games: