RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	53	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	30.87	54.16
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA103S	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	25 January 2022 (2 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7424	6144
Core clock speed	810 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	1260 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	292.3	299.5
Floating-point processing power	18.71 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	80
TMUs	232	192
Tensor Cores	232	192
Ray Tracing Cores	58	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 51.07

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.54
+6.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19702

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21042
+6.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	141 −6.4%	150−160 +6.4%
1440p	90 −5.6%	95−100 +5.6%
4K	61 −6.6%	65−70 +6.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

136

−2.9%

140−150
+2.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 −3.1%	100−105 +3.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	118 −1.7%	120−130 +1.7%
Battlefield 5	140−150 −2%	150−160 +2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	124 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 −1.9%	210−220 +1.9%
Hitman 3	162 −4.9%	170−180 +4.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −2.7%	190−200 +2.7%
Metro Exodus	130−140 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +2%	100−105 −2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −2.9%	180−190 +2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −2.2%	140−150 +2.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 −3.1%	100−105 +3.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 +0%	100−105 +0%
Battlefield 5	140−150 −2%	150−160 +2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	102 +2%	100−105 −2%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 −1.9%	210−220 +1.9%
Hitman 3	160 −6.3%	170−180 +6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −2.7%	190−200 +2.7%
Metro Exodus	130−140 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +2%	100−105 −2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	229 −4.8%	240−250 +4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −2.2%	140−150 +2.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 −3.1%	100−105 +3.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	87 −3.4%	90−95 +3.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	91 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 −1.9%	210−220 +1.9%
Hitman 3	143 −4.9%	150−160 +4.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	194 −3.1%	200−210 +3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200 −5%	210−220 +5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118 −1.7%	120−130 +1.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	84 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−110
+2%

100−105

−2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70 +0%	70−75 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 −5.3%	260−270 +5.3%
Hitman 3	107 −2.8%	110−120 +2.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	154 −3.9%	160−170 +3.9%
Metro Exodus	93 −2.2%	95−100 +2.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150 −6.7%	160−170 +6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	86 −4.7%	90−95 +4.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210−220 −4.8%	220−230 +4.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

−6.3%

85−90
+6.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	216 −6.5%	230−240 +6.5%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	93 −2.2%	95−100 +2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	42 +5%	40−45 −5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+5%

40−45

−5%

This is how RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 6% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 6% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.07	54.54
Recency	25 January 2022	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.