Arc A380 vs GeForce MX570

Place in performance ranking	329	331
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	20.86
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code name	GN20-S5	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)	14 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149
Current price	no data	$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Boost clock speed	1477 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15-45 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	131.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 and Arc A380 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	15.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX570 14.89
+3%

Arc A380 14.46

GeForce MX570 outperforms Arc A380 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX570 5764

Arc A380 6229
+8.1%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce MX570 by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

45−50

−6.7%

48
+6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+9.5%

21−24

−9.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −96.8%	61 +96.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −100%	50 +100%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +4.1%	45−50 −4.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −59%	62 +59%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −53.7%	63 +53.7%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −46.2%	76 +46.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +5.1%	35−40 −5.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −83.9%	57 +83.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −80.6%	56 +80.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −96.4%	55 +96.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −61.3%	50 +61.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −48%	37 +48%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +4.1%	45−50 −4.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −46.2%	57 +46.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −43.9%	59 +43.9%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −38.5%	72 +38.5%
Hitman 3	40−45 +5.1%	35−40 −5.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −38.7%	43 +38.7%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −73.9%	40 +73.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −48.4%	46 +48.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −113%	66 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −71.4%	48 +71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +6.9%	29 −6.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −24%	31 +24%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +4.1%	45−50 −4.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −33.3%	52 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −31.7%	54 +31.7%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −9.6%	57 +9.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −9.7%	34 +9.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +12%	25 −12%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 6.7% faster than GeForce MX570 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 20% faster than the Arc A380.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 113% faster than the GeForce MX570.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is ahead in 27 tests (44%)
Arc A380 is ahead in 23 tests (37%)
there's a draw in 12 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.89	14.46
Recency	17 December 2021	14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt