RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile with RTX 5000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
51.02

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.8820.94
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA103SAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores742412800
Core clock speed810 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed1260 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate292.31,020
Floating-point processing power18.71 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs96176
TMUs232400
Tensor Cores232400
Ray Tracing Cores58100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 51.02
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 75.20
+47.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19682
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 29010
+47.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
−40.8%
200−210
+40.8%
1440p89
−46.1%
130−140
+46.1%
4K60
−41.7%
85−90
+41.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 136
−47.1%
200−210
+47.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−44.3%
140−150
+44.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
−44.1%
170−180
+44.1%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−42.9%
210−220
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
−45.2%
180−190
+45.2%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
−42.9%
160−170
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−45.6%
300−310
+45.6%
Hitman 3 162
−42%
230−240
+42%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−45.9%
270−280
+45.9%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−43.9%
200−210
+43.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−47.1%
150−160
+47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
−42.9%
250−260
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−46%
200−210
+46%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−44.3%
140−150
+44.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
−40%
140−150
+40%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−42.9%
210−220
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
−47.1%
150−160
+47.1%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
−42.9%
160−170
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−45.6%
300−310
+45.6%
Hitman 3 160
−43.8%
230−240
+43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−45.9%
270−280
+45.9%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−43.9%
200−210
+43.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−47.1%
150−160
+47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 229
−31%
300−310
+31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−46%
200−210
+46%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−44.3%
140−150
+44.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−37.9%
120−130
+37.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−45.6%
300−310
+45.6%
Hitman 3 143
−46.9%
210−220
+46.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 194
−44.3%
280−290
+44.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200
−45%
290−300
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−44.1%
170−180
+44.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−47.1%
150−160
+47.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−47.1%
75−80
+47.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
−41.7%
350−400
+41.7%
Hitman 3 107
−40.2%
150−160
+40.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 154
−42.9%
220−230
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 93
−39.8%
130−140
+39.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150
−46.7%
220−230
+46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
−42.9%
300−310
+42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 216
−38.9%
300−310
+38.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
−39.8%
130−140
+39.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%

This is how RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 46% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 42% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.02 75.20
Recency 25 January 2022 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile has 117.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 47.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 282 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.