RTX A1000 Embedded vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
20.41

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms RTX 3050 Mobile by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking251206
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Power efficiency21.6458.29
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA107GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed712 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed1057 MHz1140 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate67.6572.96
Floating-point processing power4.329 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs6464
Tensor Cores6464
Ray Tracing Cores1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.68.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 Mobile 20.41
RTX A1000 Embedded 25.65
+25.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
RTX A1000 Embedded 11460
+25.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
1440p51
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%
4K32
−25%
40−45
+25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 127
−18.1%
150−160
+18.1%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−25%
160−170
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
−22.6%
130−140
+22.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 99
−21.2%
120−130
+21.2%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−25%
160−170
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−20.5%
100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry 5 118
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%
Fortnite 110−120
−25%
140−150
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
Forza Horizon 5 108
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Valorant 150−160
−21%
190−200
+21%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−25%
160−170
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−21%
300−310
+21%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−23%
75−80
+23%
Dota 2 169
−24.3%
210−220
+24.3%
Far Cry 5 107
−21.5%
130−140
+21.5%
Fortnite 110−120
−25%
140−150
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
Forza Horizon 5 94
−17%
110−120
+17%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
−25%
160−170
+25%
Metro Exodus 62
−21%
75−80
+21%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
−25%
210−220
+25%
Valorant 150−160
−21%
190−200
+21%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−23%
75−80
+23%
Dota 2 155
−22.6%
190−200
+22.6%
Far Cry 5 99
−21.2%
120−130
+21.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Valorant 150−160
−21%
190−200
+21%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−25%
140−150
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−25%
60−65
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−20.3%
190−200
+20.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Metro Exodus 36
−25%
45−50
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−20.7%
210−220
+20.7%
Valorant 190−200
−22.4%
240−250
+22.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 68
−25%
85−90
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Metro Exodus 23
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−25%
55−60
+25%
Valorant 120−130
−24%
160−170
+24%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Dota 2 93
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Far Cry 5 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

This is how RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX A1000 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 18% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 18% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.41 25.65
Recency 11 May 2021 30 March 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

RTX A1000 Embedded has a 25.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 4863 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 26 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile or RTX A1000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.