Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
26.28
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.26
+3.7%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205198
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Power efficiency24.2753.94
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA106AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed735 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1035 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate82.80129.6
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs8064
Tensor Cores8064
Ray Tracing Cores2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.28
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+3.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+12.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+5.8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 5170
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+2.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75
+0%
75−80
+0%
1440p43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
4K27
+0%
27−30
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−2.7%
150−160
+2.7%
Hitman 3 80
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%
Metro Exodus 143
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 98
−2%
100−105
+2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 231
+0.4%
230−240
−0.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−2.7%
150−160
+2.7%
Hitman 3 77
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%
Metro Exodus 114
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 78
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+5%
100−105
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
−3.4%
210−220
+3.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−2.7%
150−160
+2.7%
Hitman 3 67
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
−3.3%
95−100
+3.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Hitman 3 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 139
−0.7%
140−150
+0.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hitman 3 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−1.6%
130−140
+1.6%
Metro Exodus 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%

This is how RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 8% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.28 27.26
Recency 11 May 2021 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4131 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.