Quadro P4000 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	110	190
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	17.87
Power efficiency	18.19	19.84
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	TU104B	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 January 2019 (6 years ago)	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$815

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2944	1792
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	1590 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	292.6	165.8
Floating-point processing power	9.362 TFLOPS	5.304 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184	112
Tensor Cores	368	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	46	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1901 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Display Port	no data	1.4
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
VR Ready	+	no data
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	7.5	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	142 +106%	69 −106%
1440p	93 +32.9%	70−75 −32.9%
4K	65 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	11.81
1440p	no data	11.64
4K	no data	18.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +40.7%	55−60 −40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +34.9%	60−65 −34.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95 +8%	85−90 −8%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +40.7%	55−60 −40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	47 −34%	60−65 +34%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +39.1%	130−140 −39.1%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +27.8%	75−80 −27.8%
Metro Exodus	102 +32.5%	75−80 −32.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +93.7%	60−65 −93.7%
Valorant	237 +97.5%	120−130 −97.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	149 +69.3%	85−90 −69.3%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +40.7%	55−60 −40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −61.5%	60−65 +61.5%
Dota 2	111 +9.9%	100−110 −9.9%
Far Cry 5	75 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Fortnite	170−180 +20.3%	140−150 −20.3%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +39.1%	130−140 −39.1%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +27.8%	75−80 −27.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	101 +1%	100−105 −1%
Metro Exodus	87 +13%	75−80 −13%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	249 +41.5%	170−180 −41.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +12.7%	60−65 −12.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +38.6%	100−110 −38.6%
Valorant	135 +12.5%	120−130 −12.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 +2.2%	270−280 −2.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	79 −11.4%	85−90 +11.4%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +40.7%	55−60 −40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −85.3%	60−65 +85.3%
Dota 2	125 +23.8%	100−110 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +14.1%	85−90 −14.1%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +39.1%	130−140 −39.1%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +27.8%	75−80 −27.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	135 −30.4%	170−180 +30.4%
Valorant	205 +70.8%	120−130 −70.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +37.7%	50−55 −37.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +39.6%	50−55 −39.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +57.1%	27−30 −57.1%
World of Tanks	250−260 +28.1%	190−200 −28.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	83 +40.7%	55−60 −40.7%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +25%	30−35 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +37.6%	90−95 −37.6%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +37.3%	80−85 −37.3%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +34.7%	45−50 −34.7%
Metro Exodus	89 +30.9%	65−70 −30.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +43.8%	45−50 −43.8%
Valorant	142 +65.1%	85−90 −65.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +41.4%	27−30 −41.4%
Dota 2	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Metro Exodus	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	144 +53.2%	90−95 −53.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +57.6%	30−35 −57.6%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +41.4%	27−30 −41.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +0%	10−12 +0%
Dota 2	119 +116%	55−60 −116%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +40.5%	40−45 −40.5%
Fortnite	63 +61.5%	35−40 −61.5%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +35.4%	45−50 −35.4%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Valorant	75 +74.4%	40−45 −74.4%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Mobile is 106% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Mobile is 33% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Mobile is 44% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 Mobile is 116% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 85% faster.

All in all, in popular games: