Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce MX350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 with Radeon Pro 555X, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
7.32

Pro 555X outperforms MX350 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.247.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Polaris 21
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)16 July 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed747 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate29.9843.54
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1275 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s81.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.32
Pro 555X 8.42
+15%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2813
Pro 555X 3235
+15%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX350 13503
+6.4%
Pro 555X 12696

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce MX350 13777
+5.6%
Pro 555X 13051

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−11.1%
30−35
+11.1%
1440p31
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
4K26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−240%
16−18
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+5%
20−22
−5%
Metro Exodus 28
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%
Valorant 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−325%
16−18
+325%
Dota 2 51
+70%
30−33
−70%
Far Cry 5 50
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Fortnite 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−36%
30−35
+36%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 17
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85
+26.9%
65−70
−26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.5%
21−24
+9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−13%
24−27
+13%
Valorant 21
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
World of Tanks 120
−5%
120−130
+5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
−467%
16−18
+467%
Dota 2 76
+153%
30−33
−153%
Far Cry 5 40
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 19
−78.9%
30−35
+78.9%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−13.6%
65−70
+13.6%
Valorant 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
World of Tanks 50−55
−15.1%
60−65
+15.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Valorant 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 30
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Fortnite 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

This is how GeForce MX350 and Pro 555X compete in popular games:

  • Pro 555X is 11% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 555X is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 555X is 4% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 153% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 555X is 467% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
  • Pro 555X is ahead in 51 test (80%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.32 8.42
Recency 10 February 2020 16 July 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce MX350 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 275% lower power consumption.

Pro 555X, on the other hand, has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon Pro 555X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1648 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 171 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.