GRID K260Q vs GeForce MX350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 25 Watt
7.26

GRID K260Q outperforms GeForce MX350 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking509495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date20 February 2020 (4 years ago)28 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$937

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401536
Core clock speed1354 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate29.9895.36
Floating-point performanceno data2,289 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX350 and GRID K260Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.13.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.26
GRID K260Q 7.63
+5.1%

GRID K260Q outperforms GeForce MX350 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX350 2808
GRID K260Q 2949
+5%

GRID K260Q outperforms GeForce MX350 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
1440p22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
4K27
+0%
27−30
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Hitman 3 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 49
−2%
50−55
+2%
Metro Exodus 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Hitman 3 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20
−5%
21−24
+5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GeForce MX350 and GRID K260Q compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX350 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.26 7.63
Recency 20 February 2020 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX350 and GRID K260Q.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook card while GRID K260Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1548 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.