GeForce MX350 vs GRID K520

Place in the ranking	479	538
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.34	no data
Power efficiency	2.78	25.01
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK104	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	747 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	937 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	95.36	29.98
Floating-point processing power	2.289 TFLOPS	1.199 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	128	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	56.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GRID K520 9.13
+25.1%

GeForce MX350 7.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K520 3516
+25.1%

GeForce MX350 2811

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 +15.4%	26 −15.4%
1440p	35−40 +12.9%	31 −12.9%
4K	30−35 +20%	25 −20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	119.97	no data
1440p	102.83	no data
4K	119.97	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22 +0%	22 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +0%	13 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	19 +0%	19 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	35 +0%	35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Hitman 3	20 +0%	20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	129 +0%	129 +0%
Metro Exodus	37 +0%	37 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	32 +0%	32 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95 +0%	95 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	26 +0%	26 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 +0%	6 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	17 +0%	17 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	23 +0%	23 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 +0%	25 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Hitman 3	20 +0%	20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	116 +0%	116 +0%
Metro Exodus	28 +0%	28 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +0%	24 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 +0%	25 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	88 +0%	88 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 +0%	8 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6 +0%	6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	15 +0%	15 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	19 +0%	19 +0%
Hitman 3	17 +0%	17 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20 +0%	20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 +0%	19 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +0%	16 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6 +0%	6 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

This is how GRID K520 and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

GRID K520 is 15% faster in 1080p
GRID K520 is 13% faster in 1440p
GRID K520 is 20% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.13	7.30
Recency	23 July 2013	10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	20 Watt