Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.38

AI PRO R9700 outperforms MX110 by a whopping 2006% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.6018.11
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM108SNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speed978 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate16.10747.5
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX110 3.38
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+2006%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1417
AI PRO R9700 29830
+2005%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−1844%
350−400
+1844%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1977%
270−280
+1977%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
God of War 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−1971%
290−300
+1971%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1977%
270−280
+1977%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Far Cry 5 10
−2000%
210−220
+2000%
Fortnite 30
−1900%
600−650
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
God of War 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
−1844%
350−400
+1844%
Valorant 50−55
−2000%
1050−1100
+2000%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−1983%
250−260
+1983%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1977%
270−280
+1977%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
−1900%
900−950
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Dota 2 36
−1983%
750−800
+1983%
Far Cry 5 9
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Fortnite 15
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−1983%
250−260
+1983%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
God of War 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−1977%
270−280
+1977%
Metro Exodus 2
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Valorant 50−55
−2000%
1050−1100
+2000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1977%
270−280
+1977%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Dota 2 33
−1870%
650−700
+1870%
Far Cry 5 8
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
God of War 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−1983%
250−260
+1983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Valorant 50−55
−2000%
1050−1100
+2000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12
−1983%
250−260
+1983%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−1823%
500−550
+1823%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−1969%
600−650
+1969%
Valorant 30−35
−1959%
700−750
+1959%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
God of War 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Valorant 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
−2000%
210−220
+2000%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
God of War 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

This is how GeForce MX110 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 1844% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.38 71.19
Recency 17 November 2017 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce MX110 has 900% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 2006.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2491 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.