Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
33.20

AI PRO R9700 outperforms GTX 1070 Ti by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15711
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.90no data
Power efficiency14.8419.93
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24324096
Core clock speed1607 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate255.8747.5
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs152256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache912 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 Ti 33.20
AI PRO R9700 74.31
+124%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti Samples: 11669 14681
AI PRO R9700 Samples: 7 32859
+124%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
−123%
250−260
+123%
1440p72
−122%
160−170
+122%
4K55
−118%
120−130
+118%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.56no data
1440p5.54no data
4K7.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−103%
400−450
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−120%
180−190
+120%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−122%
180−190
+122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−116%
270−280
+116%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−103%
400−450
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−120%
180−190
+120%
Far Cry 5 114
−119%
250−260
+119%
Fortnite 150−160
−92.3%
300−310
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−119%
300−310
+119%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−123%
250−260
+123%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−122%
180−190
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−113%
300−310
+113%
Valorant 210−220
−111%
450−500
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−116%
270−280
+116%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−103%
400−450
+103%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−116%
600−650
+116%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−120%
180−190
+120%
Dota 2 127
−120%
280−290
+120%
Far Cry 5 108
−122%
240−250
+122%
Fortnite 150−160
−92.3%
300−310
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−119%
300−310
+119%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−123%
250−260
+123%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−117%
260−270
+117%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−122%
180−190
+122%
Metro Exodus 66
−112%
140−150
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−113%
300−310
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−123%
270−280
+123%
Valorant 210−220
−111%
450−500
+111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 111
−116%
240−250
+116%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−120%
180−190
+120%
Dota 2 121
−123%
270−280
+123%
Far Cry 5 102
−116%
220−230
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 100
−120%
220−230
+120%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−122%
180−190
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−113%
300−310
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−122%
160−170
+122%
Valorant 210−220
−111%
450−500
+111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 109
−120%
240−250
+120%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−121%
190−200
+121%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−123%
550−600
+123%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−111%
150−160
+111%
Metro Exodus 40
−113%
85−90
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−100%
350−400
+100%
Valorant 240−250
−124%
550−600
+124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
−117%
180−190
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%
Far Cry 5 75
−113%
160−170
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 81
−122%
180−190
+122%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−120%
90−95
+120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−115%
140−150
+115%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
−122%
160−170
+122%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
−109%
140−150
+109%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Metro Exodus 25
−120%
55−60
+120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−113%
100−105
+113%
Valorant 210−220
−108%
450−500
+108%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−113%
100−105
+113%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Dota 2 105
−119%
230−240
+119%
Far Cry 5 39
−118%
85−90
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−118%
120−130
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
−122%
80−85
+122%

This is how GTX 1070 Ti and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 123% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 122% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 118% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.20 74.31
Recency 2 November 2017 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has 66.7% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 123.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4441 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.