RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon AI PRO R9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.08no data
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 48GB203
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2025 (recently)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40968960
Core clock speed1660 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed2920 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors53,900 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate747.5374.4
Floating-point processing power47.84 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs256280
Tensor Cores128280
Ray Tracing Cores6470

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length267 mm167 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount32 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth644.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1a4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 70 Watt

AI PRO R9700 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon AI PRO R9700 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon AI PRO R9700 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.