Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX TITAN

Place in performance ranking	239	135
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.79	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GK110	Alchemist
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 February 2013 (11 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$640 (0.6x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2688	384
CUDA cores	2688	no data
Core clock speed	837 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,080 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	187.5 billion/sec	211.2
Floating-point performance	4,709 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX TITAN and Arc A730M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	One 8-pin and one 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384-bit GDDR5	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN 21.20

Arc A730M 35.30
+66.5%

Arc A730M outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN by 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX TITAN 8189

Arc A730M 10487
+28.1%

Arc A730M outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN by 28% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX TITAN 10470

Arc A730M 21294
+103%

Arc A730M outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN by 103% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −80%	72 +80%
1440p	24−27 −83.3%	44 +83.3%
4K	14−16 −78.6%	25 +78.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−77.5%

71
+77.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −82.9%	64 +82.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −75.4%	110−120 +75.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −80%	70−75 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −82.9%	64 +82.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −73.3%	75−80 +73.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −78%	85−90 +78%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −73.8%	130−140 +73.8%
Hitman 3	30−33 −70%	51 +70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −70%	153 +70%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −75%	100−110 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −76%	85−90 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −78%	178 +78%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −70%	85 +70%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −80%	54 +80%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −75.4%	110−120 +75.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −80%	70−75 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −80%	54 +80%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −73.3%	75−80 +73.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −78%	85−90 +78%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −73.8%	130−140 +73.8%
Hitman 3	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −67.1%	140−150 +67.1%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −70.8%	41 +70.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −76%	85−90 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −75.3%	149 +75.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −69.2%	110 +69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −80%	90−95 +80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −77.8%	48 +77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −80%	70−75 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −73.3%	52 +73.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −73.3%	75−80 +73.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −73.8%	130−140 +73.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −76%	88 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −77.1%	124 +77.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −66.7%	45 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −77.8%	48 +77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−76%

85−90
+76%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −80%	80−85 +80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −81%	35−40 +81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −76.2%	37 +76.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −73.3%	50−55 +73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −72.2%	31 +72.2%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −82.5%	70−75 +82.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −88.6%	66 +88.6%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −68%	80−85 +68%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −81.5%	45−50 +81.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −66.7%	35 +66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−71.4%

60−65
+71.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −83.3%	40−45 +83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −75%	28 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −81.5%	45−50 +81.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −66.7%	40 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−72.2%

30−35
+72.2%

This is how GTX TITAN and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

Arc A730M is 80% faster in 1080p
Arc A730M is 83% faster in 1440p
Arc A730M is 79% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.20	35.30
Recency	19 February 2013	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt