Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Arc A730M, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.80
+22.7%

GTX TITAN X outperforms Arc A730M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
Arc A730M Arc A730M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking169214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.02no data
Power efficiency9.1023.17
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM200DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723072
Core clock speed1000 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1393.6
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs192192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN X 28.80
+22.7%
Arc A730M 23.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12869
+22.7%
Arc A730M 10487

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+21.6%
74
−21.6%
1440p55−60
+22.2%
45
−22.2%
4K24−27
+9.1%
22
−9.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.10no data
1440p18.16no data
4K41.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 169
+0%
169
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 52
+0%
52
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40
+0%
40
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 102
+0%
102
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+0%
34
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 22% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 22% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 9% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.80 23.47
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 22.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A730M, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A730M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while Arc A730M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Arc A730M Arc A730M
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
P102-101 P102 101
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
HD 7950M HD 7950M
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5730
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
CMP 100HX-210 CMP 100HX-210
GTX 950 OEM GeForce GTX 950 OEM
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
RX 550X RX 550X
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
RX 590 RX 590
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD 8310G HD 8310G
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
9100M G GeForce 9100M G
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
R7 M270DX R7 M270DX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 242 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 111 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.