GeForce MX570 vs GTX 980M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon
A

Aggregated performance score

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
18.99
+27.4%

GTX 980M outperforms MX570 by a significant 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking275330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.62no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM204GN20-S5
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$583 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1038 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1127 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown15-45 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8473.92
Floating-point performance3,462 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus++
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M 18.99
+27.4%
GeForce MX570 14.90

GTX 980M outperforms MX570 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980M 7350
+27.5%
GeForce MX570 5764

GTX 980M outperforms MX570 by 28% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
+33.1%
130−140
−33.1%
Full HD72
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
1440p36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
4K27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Battlefield 5 82
+60.8%
50−55
−60.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+28.9%
35−40
−28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 58
+48.7%
35−40
−48.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+42.3%
50−55
−42.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Battlefield 5 68
+33.3%
50−55
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+28.9%
35−40
−28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 53
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 56
+36.6%
40−45
−36.6%
Forza Horizon 4 68
+30.8%
50−55
−30.8%
Hitman 3 50−55
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Metro Exodus 31
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+35.5%
30−35
−35.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+96.8%
30−35
−96.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Battlefield 5 61
+19.6%
50−55
−19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 50
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 51
+24.4%
40−45
−24.4%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Metro Exodus 19
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 45
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Hitman 3 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+30%
20−22
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how GTX 980M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 33% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 31% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 33% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 980M is 100% faster than the GeForce MX570.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 19% faster than the GTX 980M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.99 14.90
Recency 7 October 2014 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 316 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 68 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.