GeForce RTX 4050 vs GTX 980M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M with GeForce RTX 4050, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
19.07

RTX 4050 outperforms GTX 980M by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking287122
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Power efficiency13.2626.02
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM204AD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362560
Core clock speed1038 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown100 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84211.2
Floating-point processing power1.659 TFLOPS13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs9680
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s216.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M 19.07
RTX 4050 37.43
+96.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980M 7357
RTX 4050 14439
+96.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
−73.4%
300−350
+73.4%
Full HD69
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%
1440p36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
4K28
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Battlefield 5 67
−94%
130−140
+94%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 62
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Forza Horizon 4 196
−78.6%
350−400
+78.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Metro Exodus 65
−84.6%
120−130
+84.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
−90%
190−200
+90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Battlefield 5 57
−93%
110−120
+93%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 52
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 47
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
Forza Horizon 4 191
−83.2%
350−400
+83.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Metro Exodus 55
−81.8%
100−105
+81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
−90.1%
230−240
+90.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 38
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
−75%
35−40
+75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Far Cry 5 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 134
−94%
260−270
+94%
Hitman 3 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Metro Exodus 38
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−94.7%
220−230
+94.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−93.9%
190−200
+93.9%
Metro Exodus 18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

This is how GTX 980M and RTX 4050 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 is 73% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4050 is 88% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 is 94% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 is 79% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.07 37.43
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

GTX 980M has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 96.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 336 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1943 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.