Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 980

Place in the ranking	193	176
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.88	55.38
Power efficiency	12.16	9.63
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GM204	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 September 2014 (10 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 409% better value for money than GTX 980.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	3584
Core clock speed	1064 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	155.6	537.6
Floating-point processing power	4.981 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	112
TMUs	128	224
Tensor Cores	no data	448
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.78

Arc A750 31.10
+8.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 11104

Arc A750 11998
+8.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 17605

Arc A750 37288
+112%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 37997

Arc A750 98837
+160%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 12938

Arc A750 29667
+129%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980 85374

Arc A750 130715
+53.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980 323076

Arc A750 634482
+96.4%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 980 130

Arc A750 98837
+76134%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	91 −20.9%	110 +20.9%
1440p	50 −18%	59 +18%
4K	39 +8.3%	36 −8.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.03	2.63
1440p	10.98	4.90
4K	14.08	8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

−4.2%

50−55
+4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	69 +11.3%	62 −11.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −83.7%	90 +83.7%
Battlefield 5	86 −64%	140−150 +64%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −49.2%	85−90 +49.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Far Cry 5	84 −9.5%	90−95 +9.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 −40.3%	100−110 +40.3%
Forza Horizon 4	253 +25.2%	200−210 −25.2%
Hitman 3	55−60 −59.3%	90−95 +59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −38%	170−180 +38%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −46.9%	144 +46.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −35.6%	95−100 +35.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130 −26.9%	160−170 +26.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −21.6%	130−140 +21.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	83 −27.7%	106 +27.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −55.1%	76 +55.1%
Battlefield 5	74 −90.5%	140−150 +90.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −49.2%	85−90 +49.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Far Cry 5	69 −33.3%	90−95 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	64 −68.8%	100−110 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	230 +13.9%	200−210 −13.9%
Hitman 3	55−60 −59.3%	90−95 +59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −38%	170−180 +38%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −45.9%	143 +45.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −35.6%	95−100 +35.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −139%	239 +139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132 +45.1%	90−95 −45.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −21.6%	130−140 +21.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 −28.6%	45 +28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −40.8%	69 +40.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −49.2%	85−90 +49.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Far Cry 5	50 −84%	90−95 +84%
Forza Horizon 4	59 −52.5%	90 +52.5%
Hitman 3	55−60 −59.3%	90−95 +59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +14.2%	113 −14.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −99%	199 +99%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 −50%	69 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +76.2%	63 −76.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75

−35.6%

95−100
+35.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47 −83%	85−90 +83%
Far Cry New Dawn	44 −52.3%	65−70 +52.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −40.7%	38 +40.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −86.2%	54 +86.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −57.6%	50−55 +57.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −5%	21−24 +5%
Far Cry 5	33 −54.5%	50−55 +54.5%
Forza Horizon 4	147 −62.6%	230−240 +62.6%
Hitman 3	35−40 −65.7%	55−60 +65.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −53.3%	92 +53.3%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −56.4%	86 +56.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −123%	145 +123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −54.1%	57 +54.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 −29.9%	200−210 +29.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−55.1%

75−80
+55.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	22 −105%	45−50 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Hitman 3	21−24 −56.5%	35−40 +56.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −33.8%	190−200 +33.8%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −135%	80 +135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 −138%	69 +138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 −100%	28 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −87.5%	30 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −70.6%	27−30 +70.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	16 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	34 −79.4%	61 +79.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −127%	84 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −131%	30 +131%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−60%

40−45
+60%

This is how GTX 980 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 21% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 18% faster in 1440p
GTX 980 is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 980 is 76% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 139% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 980 is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
Arc A750 is ahead in 60 tests (91%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.78	31.10
Recency	19 September 2014	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	225 Watt

GTX 980 has 36.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 8.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980 and Arc A750.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.