560 Ti vs 970M

#ad
Buy
SLI
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 970M
14.79
+88.4%

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 88% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking327482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.881.75
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM204GF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years old)25 January 2011 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 $249
Current price$848 (0.3x MSRP)$130 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 970M has 122% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHz822 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown170 Watt
Texture fill rate83.0452.67
Floating-point performance2,657 gflops1,263.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970M and GeForce GTX 560 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz2004 MHz
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s128.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970M 14.79
+88.4%
GTX 560 Ti 7.85

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 88% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970M 5732
+88.3%
GTX 560 Ti 3044

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 88% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 970M 28845
+86.2%
GTX 560 Ti 15494

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 86% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 970M 9878
+146%
GTX 560 Ti 4013

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 146% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 970M 7463
+115%
GTX 560 Ti 3470

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 115% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 970M 18330
+67.1%
GTX 560 Ti 10970

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 67% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 970M 51
+34.2%
GTX 560 Ti 38

970M outperforms 560 Ti by 34% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136
+116%
63
−116%
Full HD58
−12.1%
65
+12.1%
1440p27
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
4K21
+110%
10−12
−110%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
Battlefield 5 66
+154%
24−27
−154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 46
+142%
18−20
−142%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+105%
20−22
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+126%
27−30
−126%
Hitman 3 40−45
+116%
18−20
−116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+135%
16−18
−135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
Battlefield 5 54
+108%
24−27
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 43
+126%
18−20
−126%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+90%
20−22
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+96.3%
27−30
−96.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+116%
18−20
−116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Metro Exodus 24
+118%
10−12
−118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+100%
16−18
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+181%
16−18
−181%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
Battlefield 5 49
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 39
+105%
18−20
−105%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+75%
20−22
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Hitman 3 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Metro Exodus 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 27
+125%
12−14
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+127%
10−12
−127%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Hitman 3 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+220%
5−6
−220%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 15
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how GTX 970M and GTX 560 Ti compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 970M is 116% faster than GTX 560 Ti

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 12.1% faster than GTX 970M

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 970M is 92.9% faster than GTX 560 Ti

4K resolution:

  • GTX 970M is 110% faster than GTX 560 Ti

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 970M is 300% faster than the GTX 560 Ti.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 560 Ti is 50% faster than the GTX 970M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 970M is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • GTX 560 Ti is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 14.79 7.85
Recency 7 October 2014 25 January 2011
Cost $2560.89 $249
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTX 970M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 275 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 731 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.