HD Graphics vs Radeon 820M

Place in the ranking	1053	1204
Place by popularity	not in top-100	45
Power efficiency	no data	1.57
Architecture	RDNA 3+ (2024)	Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code name	Krackan Point	Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 June 2024 (1 year ago)	1 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	48
Core clock speed	no data	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	2900 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	6.300
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.1008 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	1
TMUs	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	7500 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	no data	11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.0
OpenGL	no data	4.0
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Fortnite	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Valorant	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Fortnite	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Valorant	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Valorant	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hogwarts Legacy	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%