Radeon RX 6500 vs GeForce GTX 950

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5
13.80

Radeon RX 6500 outperforms GeForce GTX 950 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking350258
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.03no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)no data
GPU code nameGM206no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 August 2015 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data
Current price$12.88 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1024 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1188 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)90 Wattno data
Texture fill rate49.2 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance1,825 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon RX 6500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length7.938" (20.2 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinsno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.80
RX 6500 20.27
+46.9%

Radeon RX 6500 outperforms GeForce GTX 950 by 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 950 5340
RX 6500 7843
+46.9%

Radeon RX 6500 outperforms GeForce GTX 950 by 47% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
4K21
−42.9%
30−35
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−41.4%
40−45
+41.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−44.7%
65−70
+44.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−47.2%
50−55
+47.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−47.2%
50−55
+47.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−40.8%
65−70
+40.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−41.4%
40−45
+41.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−44.7%
65−70
+44.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−47.2%
50−55
+47.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−47.2%
50−55
+47.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−40.8%
65−70
+40.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−15.8%
40−45
+15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−41.4%
40−45
+41.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−44.7%
65−70
+44.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−47.2%
50−55
+47.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−40.8%
65−70
+40.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−110%
40−45
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Hitman 3 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−47.4%
27−30
+47.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

This is how GTX 950 and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is 44% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 is 43% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 110% faster than the GTX 950.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6500 surpassed GTX 950 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.80 20.27

The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1927 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.