Radeon RX 6500 vs GeForce GTX 960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960 with Radeon RX 6500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 960
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
15.26

RX 6500 outperforms GTX 960 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345276
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.83no data
Power efficiency9.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameGM206no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 January 2015 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1127 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate75.39no data
Floating-point processing power2.413 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)400 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960 15.26
RX 6500 19.56
+28.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960 6097
RX 6500 7817
+28.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−21%
75−80
+21%
4K30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.21no data
4K6.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−25.5%
60−65
+25.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−32.3%
85−90
+32.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−28.6%
50−55
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Valorant 60−65
−28.1%
80−85
+28.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−25.5%
60−65
+25.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%
Dota 2 33
−118%
70−75
+118%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−19.3%
65−70
+19.3%
Fortnite 85−90
−21.6%
100−110
+21.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−32.3%
85−90
+32.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−28.6%
50−55
+28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
−44.9%
70−75
+44.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
−30.6%
60−65
+30.6%
Valorant 60−65
−28.1%
80−85
+28.1%
World of Tanks 200−210
−16.4%
230−240
+16.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−25.5%
60−65
+25.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%
Dota 2 55−60
−26.3%
70−75
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−19.3%
65−70
+19.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−32.3%
85−90
+32.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
Valorant 60−65
−25%
80−85
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−23.3%
180−190
+23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
World of Tanks 110−120
−27.3%
140−150
+27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−35.9%
50−55
+35.9%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Valorant 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Dota 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−25.9%
30−35
+25.9%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−25.9%
30−35
+25.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Dota 2 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Fortnite 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how GTX 960 and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 is 118% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is ahead in 42 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.26 19.56

RX 6500 has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3883 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.