FirePro W5000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti with FirePro W5000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.87
+47.5%

GTX 660 Ti outperforms W5000 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.751.55
Power efficiency5.227.08
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2012 (12 years ago)7 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 660 Ti has 77% better value for money than FirePro W5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344768
Core clock speed915 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate109.839.60
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs11248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm183 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / half length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s800 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort countno data2
Dual-link DVI support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 660 Ti 9.87
+47.5%
FirePro W5000 6.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 Ti 4410
+47.6%
FirePro W5000 2988

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15363
+54.1%
FirePro W5000 9969

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15564
+25.2%
FirePro W5000 12432

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+54%
50−55
−54%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88
+209%
11.98
−209%
  • GTX 660 Ti has 209% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Fortnite 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Valorant 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 192
+47.7%
130−140
−47.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Dota 2 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Fortnite 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Valorant 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Dota 2 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Valorant 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+62%
50−55
−62%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Valorant 110−120
+57.3%
75−80
−57.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and FirePro W5000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 54% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.87 6.69
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 660 Ti has a 47.5% higher aggregate performance score.

FirePro W5000, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while FirePro W5000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMD FirePro W5000
FirePro W5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 850 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 127 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 Ti or FirePro W5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.