GeForce GTX 1650 vs GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	374	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	3
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	38.91
Power efficiency	6.37	18.67
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	no data	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	896
Core clock speed	811 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	93.24
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 13.94

GTX 1650 20.43
+46.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569

GTX 1650 13645
+42.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
1440p	24−27 −62.5%	39 +62.5%
4K	14−16 −57.1%	22 +57.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.16
1440p	no data	3.82
4K	no data	6.77

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−45.5%

30−35
+45.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −60.6%	53 +60.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −104%	47 +104%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −68.1%	79 +68.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −79.3%	52 +79.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −88.2%	64 +88.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −100%	80 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −144%	229 +144%
Hitman 3	27−30 −81.5%	49 +81.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −295%	292 +295%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −106%	101 +106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −92.5%	77 +92.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −145%	115 +145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −195%	224 +195%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −152%	83 +152%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −52.2%	35 +52.2%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −53.2%	72 +53.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −58.6%	46 +58.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −52.9%	52 +52.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −40%	56 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −114%	201 +114%
Hitman 3	27−30 −74.1%	47 +74.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −251%	260 +251%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −44.9%	71 +44.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −37.5%	55 +37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −57.4%	74 +57.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −31.4%	45−50 +31.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −171%	206 +171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +32%	25 −32%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +76.9%	13 −76.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +263%	8 −263%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −14.7%	39 +14.7%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +44.6%	65 −44.6%
Hitman 3	27−30 −51.9%	41 +51.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +23.3%	60 −23.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −31.9%	62 +31.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −20%	42 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +262%	21 −262%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−35%

54
+35%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −50%	42 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −63.6%	36 +63.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −28.6%	18 +28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −41.2%	24 +41.2%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −64.9%	122 +64.9%
Hitman 3	16−18 −58.8%	27 +58.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −48.3%	43 +48.3%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −64%	41 +64%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −80%	45 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −62.9%	145 +62.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−45.8%

35
+45.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −42.9%	20 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −54.5%	17 +54.5%
Hitman 3	10−11 −30%	13 +30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +73.2%	41 −73.2%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −92.9%	27 +92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −100%	26 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +40%	5 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −57.9%	30 +57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −85.7%	26 +85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −33.3%	8 +33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−30.8%

17
+30.8%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 is 53% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 is 63% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 is 57% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 263% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 295% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
GTX 1650 is ahead in 64 tests (89%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.94	20.43
Recency	30 May 2013	23 April 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt

GTX 1650 has a 46.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.