Tesla M2090 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Place in performance ranking	410	430
Place by popularity	21	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	1.08	0.52
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GM107	GF110
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$357 (2.4x MSRP)	$1844

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 750 Ti has 108% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	512
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	651 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	41.66
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	1,331.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	248 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	3696 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	177.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.08
+6.4%

Tesla M2090 9.47

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Tesla M2090 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 750 Ti 35

Tesla M2090 49
+40%

Tesla M2090 outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 40% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

50
+11.1%

45−50

−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18
+14.3%

14−16

−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Hitman 3	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Hitman 3	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Hitman 3	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Hitman 3	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

GTX 750 Ti is 11.1% faster than Tesla M2090 in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	10.08	9.47
Recency	18 February 2014	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	250 Watt