Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GTX 680

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680 with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 680
2012
2048 MB GDDR5, 195 Watt
14.45

P2200 outperforms GTX 680 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.03no data
Power efficiency5.0822.14
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK104GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361280
Core clock speed1006 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1058 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)195 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate135.4119.4
Floating-point processing power3.25 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs12880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length254 mm201 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2048 MB5 GB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5160 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680 14.45
Quadro P2200 24.22
+67.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680 5567
Quadro P2200 9334
+67.7%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 680 18403
Quadro P2200 32445
+76.3%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 680 17527
Quadro P2200 31058
+77.2%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 680 13248
Quadro P2200 29989
+126%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Full HD74
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
4K23
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.74no data
4K21.70no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
Hitman 3 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−50%
24−27
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

This is how GTX 680 and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 67% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P2200 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2200 is 52% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.45 24.22
Recency 22 March 2012 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2048 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 195 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P2200 has a 67.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680 is a desktop card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 583 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 365 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.