NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell
 
Vega
Code name
GM204
 
Vega Mobile
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
 
15 November 2018

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
1024
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
no data
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
no data
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
no data
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
75 Watt
Texture fill rate
78 GTexel / s
 
76.16 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
large
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
no data
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
no data
Memory bandwidth
160 GB / s
 
307.2 GB / s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
Display Port
1.2
 
no data

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus
+
 
-
3D Vision Pro
+
 
no data
Mosaic
+
 
no data
nView Display Management
+
 
no data
Optimus
+
 
no data
nView
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
no data
Shader Model
5.0
 
no data
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.6
Vulkan
+
 
-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

M4000M 22.79 +6.9%
Pro Vega 16 21.32

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

M4000M 49204
Pro Vega 16 56273 +14.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Score

M4000M 6937 +0.5%
Pro Vega 16 6902

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

M4000M 7723
Pro Vega 16 7745 +0.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

M4000M 10259
Pro Vega 16 10569 +3%

Passmark

M4000M 5008 +7%
Pro Vega 16 4682

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
 
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

6.9% faster in synthetic tests
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
nView
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Optimus Support

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Much newer (15 November 2018 vs 2 October 2015)
More pipelines (1024 vs 1)
Higher memory bandwidth (307.2 vs 160 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (75 vs 100 watts)

So, Quadro M4000M or Pro Vega 16?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.