NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
78 GTexel / s
76.16 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
160 GB / s
307.2 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
M4000M 22.79 +6.9%
Pro Vega 16 21.32
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Pro Vega 16 56273 +14.4%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
M4000M 6937 +0.5%
Pro Vega 16 6902
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Pro Vega 16 7745 +0.3%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Pro Vega 16 10569 +3%
M4000M 5008 +7%
Pro Vega 16 4682
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
6.9% faster in synthetic tests
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Much newer (15 November 2018 vs 2 October 2015)
More pipelines (1024 vs 1)
Higher memory bandwidth (307.2 vs 160 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (75 vs 100 watts)
So, Quadro M4000M or Pro Vega 16?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.