Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG84Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 October 2007 (16 years ago)7 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699
Current price$50 $246 (0.4x MSRP)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324096
Core clock speed470 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1668 MHz
Number of transistors289 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate7.520427.0
Floating-point performance60.16 gflops14,336 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth20.32 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125
CUDA1.1no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 5 October 2007 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 345 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.