GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs 680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 680
2012
2048 MB GDDR5, 195 Watt
14.36
+120%

680 outperforms 650 Ti by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking340539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.170.63
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)9 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $149
Current price$156 (0.3x MSRP)$251 (1.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 680 has 721% better value for money than GTX 650 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed1006 MHz928 MHz
Boost clock speed1058 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)195 Watt110 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate128.8 billion/sec59.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance3,090.4 gflops1,425 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.0" (25.4 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinOne 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2048 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s86.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI
Multi monitor support4 displays4 Displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680 14.36
+120%
GTX 650 Ti 6.52

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 680 5552
+120%
GTX 650 Ti 2522

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 120% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 680 7587
+121%
GTX 650 Ti 3430

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 121% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 680 18422
+133%
GTX 650 Ti 7903

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 133% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 680 17476
+113%
GTX 650 Ti 8194

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 113% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 680 13248
+113%
GTX 650 Ti 6223

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 113% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 680 54
+135%
GTX 650 Ti 23

680 outperforms 650 Ti by 135% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
+150%
18−21
−150%
Full HD75
+150%
30−35
−150%
4K24
+140%
10−12
−140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+144%
9−10
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Hitman 3 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+129%
7−8
−129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

This is how GTX 680 and GTX 650 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680 is 150% faster in 900p
  • GTX 680 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 680 is 140% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.36 6.52
Recency 22 March 2012 9 October 2012
Cost $499 $149
Power consumption (TDP) 195 Watt 110 Watt

The GeForce GTX 680 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 560 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1669 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.