Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce GTX 590

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 590
2011
3072MB (1536MB per GPU) GDDR5
8.63

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 617% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking46025
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.4727.96
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGF110Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 March 2011 (13 years ago)25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $579
Current price$600 (0.9x MSRP)$669 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 5849% better value for money than GTX 590.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243840
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed607 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt263 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7 billion/sec604.8
Floating-point performance2x 1,244.2 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 8-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)16 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU)256 Bit
Memory clock speed1707 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth327.7 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 590 8.63
RX 7800 XT 61.86
+617%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 617% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 590 3341
RX 7800 XT 23948
+617%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 617% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 590 25720
RX 7800 XT 131792
+412%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 412% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 590 9167
RX 7800 XT 63292
+590%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 590% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 590 6680
RX 7800 XT 50181
+651%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 651% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−538%
300−350
+538%
Full HD109
−96.3%
214
+96.3%
1200p112
−614%
800−850
+614%
1440p16−18
−688%
126
+688%
4K10−12
−660%
76
+660%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1885%
258
+1885%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−433%
95−100
+433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−792%
100−110
+792%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−414%
140−150
+414%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−575%
160−170
+575%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1385%
193
+1385%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−767%
182
+767%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−605%
155
+605%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−480%
170−180
+480%
Hitman 3 21−24
−814%
190−200
+814%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−694%
130−140
+694%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−580%
100−110
+580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1321%
270
+1321%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−607%
100−110
+607%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−433%
95−100
+433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−792%
100−110
+792%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−414%
140−150
+414%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−575%
160−170
+575%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1138%
161
+1138%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−733%
175
+733%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−586%
151
+586%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−480%
170−180
+480%
Hitman 3 21−24
−814%
190−200
+814%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−694%
130−140
+694%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1162%
164
+1162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−580%
100−110
+580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1142%
236
+1142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1839%
349
+1839%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−607%
100−110
+607%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−433%
95−100
+433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−792%
100−110
+792%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−414%
140−150
+414%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1038%
148
+1038%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−671%
162
+671%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−518%
136
+518%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−480%
170−180
+480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−956%
190
+956%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−607%
100−110
+607%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−754%
110−120
+754%
Hitman 3 12−14
−915%
130−140
+915%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−607%
95−100
+607%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1371%
103
+1371%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1217%
158
+1217%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−750%
65−70
+750%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2325%
97
+2325%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1050%
161
+1050%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−931%
134
+931%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−833%
140−150
+833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1650%
140
+1650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
Hitman 3 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−688%
60−65
+688%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3250%
67
+3250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1975%
83
+1975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1783%
113
+1783%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1371%
103
+1371%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−990%
109
+990%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

This is how GTX 590 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 538% faster than GTX 590 in 900p
  • RX 7800 XT is 96.3% faster than GTX 590 in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 614% faster than GTX 590 in 1200p
  • RX 7800 XT is 688% faster than GTX 590 in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 660% faster than GTX 590 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 4300% faster than the GTX 590.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed GTX 590 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 8.63 61.86
Recency 24 March 2011 25 August 2023
Cost $699 $579
Maximum RAM amount 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 263 Watt

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1757 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.