Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Radeon R7 350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 768MB
4.33

R7 350 outperforms GTX 460 768MB by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking683613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.99
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameno dataCape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data6 July 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336512
Core clock speed675 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−23.3%
90−95
+23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Valorant 40−45
−25%
55−60
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and R7 350 compete in popular games:

  • R7 350 is 28% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.33 5.57

R7 350 has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 97 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 491 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 768MB or Radeon R7 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.