GeForce GTX 460 768MB: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce GTX 460 768MB provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 4.36% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

This is a Fermi architecture desktop card primarily aimed at office use.

Primary details

Some basic facts about GeForce GTX 460 768MB: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking673
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)
Market segmentDesktop
Release dateno data

Detailed specifications

GeForce GTX 460 768MB's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 460 768MB's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed675 MHzof 2670 MHz (Arc B580)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 460 768MB: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Memory bus width192 Bitof 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1800 MHzof 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)

API compatibility

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 460 768MB, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX11

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce GTX 460 768MB. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460 768MB 4.36

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 460 768MB 2811

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 460 768MB 12262

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 460 768MB 2092

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 460 768MB 17589

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 460 768MB 133103

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GTX 460 768MB is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
Battlefield 5 10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
Far Cry 5 9−10
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
Hitman 3 10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
Metro Exodus 9−10
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
Battlefield 5 10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
Far Cry 5 9−10
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
Hitman 3 10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
Metro Exodus 9−10
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
Far Cry 5 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
Hitman 3 10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
Hitman 3 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
Metro Exodus 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
Hitman 3 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
Metro Exodus 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6

Closest competitors

GeForce GTX 460 768MB's performance relative to its closest rivals among desktop graphics cards.


GeForce GTX 460 768MB 100

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce GTX 460 768MB is Radeon R7 250E, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 460 768MB:

GeForce GTX 460 768MB 100
Radeon 550X 83.03

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GTX 460 768MB according to our statistics.

All comparisons with GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GTX 460 768MB, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.