NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB: specs and benchmarks

VS

Summary

This is a Fermi architecture desktop card primarily aimed at office use.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 4.36% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

General info

Some basic facts about GeForce GTX 460 768MB: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking619
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)
Market segmentDesktop
Release dateno data
Current price$149 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Technical specs

GeForce GTX 460 768MB's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 460 768MB's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed675 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 460 768MB: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Memory bus width192 Bitof 19000 (GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB)
Memory clock speed1800 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)

API support

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 460 768MB, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX11

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce GTX 460 768MB. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 460 768MB 12262

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 460 768MB 2811

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 460 768MB 2092

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 460 768MB 17589

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 460 768MB 133103

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GTX 460 768MB is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD47

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Battlefield 5 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
Far Cry 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
Hitman 3 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Battlefield 5 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
Far Cry 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
Hitman 3 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Metro Exodus 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Battlefield 5 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
Far Cry 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
Hitman 3 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 5−6

Relative perfomance

GeForce GTX 460 768MB's performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce GTX 460 768MB is Radeon HD 7750, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our ranking.

HD 7750Radeon HD7750
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 460 768MB:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 100

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GTX 460 768MB according to our statistics.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.7 78 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GTX 460 768MB, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.