Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6
33.40
+87.2%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by an impressive 87% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking150290
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.84no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Xe LPG
GPU code nameTuring TU116Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data
Current price$284 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15368
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate169.9no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.40
+87.2%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 17.84

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 87% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
+41.8%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 43185

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 42% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+86.5%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 12276

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 86% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
+84.6%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 85% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Ti 93095
+119%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 42473

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 119% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD105
+163%
40
−163%
1440p59
+269%
16
−269%
4K38
+111%
18−21
−111%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+95%
40−45
−95%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
+132%
35−40
−132%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+139%
30−35
−139%
Battlefield 5 129
+115%
60−65
−115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120
+161%
45−50
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+103%
35−40
−103%
Far Cry 5 109
+195%
37
−195%
Far Cry New Dawn 98
+104%
45−50
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+111%
60−65
−111%
Hitman 3 100−110
+106%
50−55
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+118%
33
−118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 82
+183%
27−30
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
+147%
35−40
−147%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+85.3%
30−35
−85.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+94.6%
35−40
−94.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Battlefield 5 112
+86.7%
60−65
−86.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 89
+93.5%
45−50
−93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Far Cry 5 99
+183%
35
−183%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+93.8%
45−50
−93.8%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+96.8%
60−65
−96.8%
Hitman 3 100−110
+106%
50−55
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+167%
27
−167%
Metro Exodus 55
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82
+116%
35−40
−116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+170%
43
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+85.3%
30−35
−85.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+43.2%
35−40
−43.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%
Battlefield 5 102
+70%
60−65
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 94
+185%
33
−185%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+75%
45−50
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+56.5%
60−65
−56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+170%
23
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+85.3%
30−35
−85.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57
+119%
24−27
−119%
Hitman 3 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 33
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+115%
12−14
−115%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+122%
21−24
−122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+116%
18−20
−116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Battlefield 5 76
+94.9%
35−40
−94.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Far Cry 5 67
+131%
27−30
−131%
Far Cry New Dawn 65
+91.2%
30−35
−91.2%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+120%
35−40
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+137%
18−20
−137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
+138%
12−14
−138%
Hitman 3 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Metro Exodus 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+136%
10−12
−136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+139%
18−20
−139%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+127%
10−12
−127%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Battlefield 5 43
+115%
20−22
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+104%
24−27
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 163% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 269% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 111% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 195% faster than the Arc 8-Cores iGPU.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti surpassed Arc 8-Cores iGPU in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.40 17.84
Recency 22 February 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6710 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 18 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.