HD Graphics 3000 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super with HD Graphics 3000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.07
+4911%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 4911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1481147
Place by popularity889
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.60no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)
GPU code nameTuring TU116Sandy Bridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$277 (1.2x MSRP)$476

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Super and HD Graphics 3000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140812
Core clock speed1530 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate157.113.80
Floating-point performanceno data20.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Super and HD Graphics 3000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+4911%
HD Graphics 3000 0.66

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 4911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Super 12771
+4928%
HD Graphics 3000 254

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 4928% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Super 76654
+4789%
HD Graphics 3000 1568

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 4789% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Super 93241
+3626%
HD Graphics 3000 2503

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 3626% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+1025%
8
−1025%
1440p54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
4K300−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3300−3350
+4900%
66
−4900%
Battlefield 5 5350−5400
+4900%
100−110
−4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Far Cry 5 3700−3750
+4900%
70−75
−4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 7200−7250
+4900%
144
−4900%
Hitman 3 100−105
+4900%
2−3
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 600−650
+4900%
12−14
−4900%
Metro Exodus 7200−7250
+4900%
144
−4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4000−4050
+4900%
80
−4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+4900%
7−8
−4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+4900%
10−11
−4900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2400−2450
+4900%
48
−4900%
Battlefield 5 5350−5400
+4900%
100−110
−4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Far Cry 5 3700−3750
+4900%
70−75
−4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 6650−6700
+4900%
130−140
−4900%
Hitman 3 100−105
+4900%
2−3
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 600−650
+4900%
12−14
−4900%
Metro Exodus 5550−5600
+4900%
111
−4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3200−3250
+4900%
64
−4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+4900%
7−8
−4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+4900%
10−11
−4900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2200−2250
+4900%
44
−4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Far Cry 5 3700−3750
+4900%
70−75
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 5350−5400
+4900%
107
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 600−650
+4900%
12−14
−4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+4900%
7−8
−4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+4900%
10−11
−4900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2850−2900
+4900%
57
−4900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3150−3200
+4900%
60−65
−4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4100−4150
+4900%
82
−4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2000−2050
+4900%
40
−4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1700−1750
+4900%
34
−4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 200−210
+4900%
4−5
−4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4200−4250
+4900%
84
−4900%
Hitman 3 300−310
+4900%
6−7
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%
Metro Exodus 3350−3400
+4900%
67
−4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4000−4050
+4900%
80
−4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2250−2300
+4900%
45−50
−4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1200−1250
+4900%
24
−4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+4900%
3−4
−4900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1650−1700
+4900%
30−35
−4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1550−1600
+4900%
31
−4900%
Hitman 3 1250−1300
+4900%
25
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1350−1400
+4900%
27
−4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2000−2050
+4900%
40
−4900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 900−950
+4900%
18
−4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 950−1000
+4900%
19
−4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 550−600
+4900%
11
−4900%
Far Cry 5 950−1000
+4900%
18−20
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 2700−2750
+4900%
54
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Metro Exodus 200−210
+4900%
4−5
−4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+4900%
12
−4900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+4900%
2−3
−4900%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 1025% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 5300% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.07 0.66
Recency 29 October 2019 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17961 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 2219 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.