GeForce GTX 1650 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.57

GTX 1650 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 2993% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1200281
Place by popularity963
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.69
Power efficiencyno data18.57
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+TU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96896
Core clock speed650 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown75 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6093.24
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 3000 0.57
GTX 1650 17.63
+2993%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254
GTX 1650 7879
+3002%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 3000 1568
GTX 1650 44694
+2750%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 3000 2503
GTX 1650 50549
+1920%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−611%
64
+611%
1440p1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%
4K0−124

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.33
1440pno data3.92
4Kno data6.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1025%
90
+1025%
Valorant 27−30
−907%
292
+907%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11
−2000%
230−240
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Dota 2 8
−1113%
97
+1113%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1975%
83
+1975%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−975%
86
+975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Valorant 27−30
−797%
260
+797%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Dota 2 7
−1214%
92
+1214%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−725%
66
+725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−925%
41
+925%
Valorant 27−30
−141%
70
+141%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−6850%
130−140
+6850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 18−20
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2200%
46
+2200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4100%
42
+4100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 14−16
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
33
+120%
Valorant 4−5
−1975%
83
+1975%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
11
+450%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 211
+0%
211
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Fortnite 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+0%
81
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 61
+0%
61
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 177
+0%
177
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 611% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 3700% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 is 6850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 31 test (51%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 17.63
Recency 1 February 2011 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 has a 2993% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2550 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24942 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.