Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Tesla T4 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1380
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR5, GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 12000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 585 MHz
- Max video memory 16 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 10000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 241 | 147 |
Value for money | 42.33 | 7.07 |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Turing (2018−2021) |
GPU code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | TU104 |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 (4 years old) | 13 September 2018 (4 years old) |
Current price | $301 | $1197 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 70 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 254.4 |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Tesla T4 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 168 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Tesla T4 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 53% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Tesla T4 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 53% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 68 | no data |
1440p | 36 | no data |
4K | 23 | no data |
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 52 | no data |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 41 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 55−60 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40 | no data |
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 32 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 55−60 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 27−30 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40 | no data |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40 | no data |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 38 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 37 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 24 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 20 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 13 | no data |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 22 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 47 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 15 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 35 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 39 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 12 | no data |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 19 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 15 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 12 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | no data |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 25 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 18 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 19 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8 | no data |
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
- Tesla T4 is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
- there's a draw in 0 tests (0%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 18.07 | 27.60 |
Recency | 23 April 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
Memory bus width | 128 | 256 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2560 |
Memory bandwidth | 192 | 320 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 70 Watt |
Based on the results of synthetic and gaming tests, our recommendation leans towards the Tesla T4 due to its superior performance when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile graphics card.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.