Tesla T4 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Price now 301$

Games supported 83%

Price now 1197$

Games supported 95%

User ratings: view and submit

Questions and comments

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	241	147
Value for money	42.33	7.07
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N18P-G0, N18P-G61	TU104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	23 April 2019 (4 years old)	13 September 2018 (4 years old)
Current price	$301	$1197

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	585 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.84	254.4

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Tesla T4 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.07

Tesla T4 27.60
+52.7%

Tesla T4 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 53% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 24%

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Tesla T4 10867
+52.7%

Tesla T4 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 53% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	68	no data
1440p	36	no data
4K	23	no data

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	41	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	55−60	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	32	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	55−60	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	27−30	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38	no data
Hitman 3	37	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	24	no data
Metro Exodus	20	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	47	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	15	no data
Far Cry 5	35	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	39	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12	no data

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7	no data
Hitman 3	19	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	15	no data
Metro Exodus	12	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9	no data
Battlefield 5	25	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5	no data
Far Cry 5	18	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	19	no data
Forza Horizon 4	24−27	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8	no data

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
Tesla T4 is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
there's a draw in 0 tests (0%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	18.07	27.60
Recency	23 April 2019	13 September 2018
Memory bus width	128	256
Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Memory bandwidth	192	320
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt

Based on the results of synthetic and gaming tests, our recommendation leans towards the Tesla T4 due to its superior performance when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile graphics card.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.