GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.10
+114%

RTX 4000 outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 4000 RTX 4000
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115312
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.30no data
Power efficiency16.9525.37
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1005 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate222.599.84
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 39.10
+114%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15212
+114%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+103%
59
−103%
1440p75−80
+103%
37
−103%
4K50−55
+108%
24
−108%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.49no data
1440p11.99no data
4K17.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 51
+0%
51
+0%
Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30
+0%
30
+0%
Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 103% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 103% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 is 108% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.10 18.29
Recency 13 November 2018 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 113.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
GTX 970M GTX 970M
vs
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
vs
RX 5300M Radeon RX 5300M
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
T600 T600
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
8600M GT GeForce 8600M GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 497 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3428 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.