Radeon Pro Vega II vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with Radeon Pro Vega II, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
48.11
+19%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms Pro Vega II by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6998
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.3616.43
Power efficiency13.756.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Ti has 30% better value for money than Pro Vega II.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1481 MHz1574 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt475 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.4440.3
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs8864
TMUs224256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount11 GB32 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz806 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s825.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.11
+19%
Pro Vega II 40.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18566
+19%
Pro Vega II 15596

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD131
+19.1%
110−120
−19.1%
1440p82
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
4K69
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100
+25%
80−85
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Battlefield 5 162
+24.6%
130−140
−24.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Far Cry 5 122
+22%
100−105
−22%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+23.2%
95−100
−23.2%
Forza Horizon 4 293
+22.1%
240−250
−22.1%
Hitman 3 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+19.4%
160−170
−19.4%
Metro Exodus 144
+20%
120−130
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+22.4%
85−90
−22.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215
+19.4%
180−190
−19.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 145
+20.8%
120−130
−20.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Battlefield 5 147
+22.5%
120−130
−22.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Far Cry 5 96
+20%
80−85
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Forza Horizon 4 284
+23.5%
230−240
−23.5%
Hitman 3 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+19.4%
160−170
−19.4%
Metro Exodus 144
+20%
120−130
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+22.4%
85−90
−22.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196
+22.5%
160−170
−22.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+23.8%
80−85
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Far Cry 5 73
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+20%
100−105
−20%
Hitman 3 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 153
+27.5%
120−130
−27.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+19.3%
140−150
−19.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+22.5%
80−85
−22.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+21%
100−105
−21%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+20%
90−95
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Far Cry 5 55
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 265
+20.5%
220−230
−20.5%
Hitman 3 65−70
+30%
50−55
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+24.2%
95−100
−24.2%
Metro Exodus 88
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+23%
100−105
−23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+22.5%
80−85
−22.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Hitman 3 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+19.4%
170−180
−19.4%
Metro Exodus 60
+20%
50−55
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+20%
60−65
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 31
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+25%
60−65
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+20%
60−65
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and Pro Vega II compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 19% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 26% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.11 40.42
Recency 10 March 2017 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 475 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 19% higher aggregate performance score, and 90% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 190.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega II in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9535 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 80 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.