Radeon Pro Vega II vs Titan X Pascal

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with Radeon Pro Vega II, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
33.89

Pro Vega II outperforms Titan X Pascal by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.9517.22
Power efficiency9.355.89
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega II has 148% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1417 MHz1574 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9440.3
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs224256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz806 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s825.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.89
Pro Vega II 40.58
+19.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
Pro Vega II 15596
+19.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
−19%
150−160
+19%
1440p74
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%
4K58
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.52
+54.1%
14.66
−54.1%
1440p16.20
+59.7%
25.87
−59.7%
4K20.67
+63.7%
33.83
−63.7%
  • Titan X Pascal has 54% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal has 60% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal has 64% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 92
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Counter-Strike 2 74
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 251
−19.5%
300−310
+19.5%
Forza Horizon 5 124
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%
Metro Exodus 150
−13.3%
170−180
+13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 125
−12%
140−150
+12%
Valorant 212
−17.9%
250−260
+17.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 168
−19%
200−210
+19%
Counter-Strike 2 63
−19%
75−80
+19%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
−15.4%
75−80
+15.4%
Dota 2 191
−15.2%
220−230
+15.2%
Far Cry 5 146
−16.4%
170−180
+16.4%
Fortnite 150−160
−16.1%
180−190
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 4 194
−18.6%
230−240
+18.6%
Forza Horizon 5 113
−15%
130−140
+15%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
−18.8%
190−200
+18.8%
Metro Exodus 106
−13.2%
120−130
+13.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 250
−16%
290−300
+16%
Red Dead Redemption 2 58
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
−12.1%
130−140
+12.1%
Valorant 117
−19.7%
140−150
+19.7%
World of Tanks 270−280
−7.9%
300−310
+7.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 64
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%
Counter-Strike 2 55
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Dota 2 232
−16.4%
270−280
+16.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
Forza Horizon 4 167
−13.8%
190−200
+13.8%
Forza Horizon 5 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 146
−16.4%
170−180
+16.4%
Valorant 181
−16%
210−220
+16%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 103
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−14.3%
200−210
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
World of Tanks 210−220
−15.2%
250−260
+15.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−15.4%
75−80
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 122
−14.8%
140−150
+14.8%
Forza Horizon 5 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Metro Exodus 101
−18.8%
120−130
+18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Valorant 110
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 99
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 114
−14%
130−140
+14%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Dota 2 160
−18.8%
190−200
+18.8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Fortnite 67
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 45
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Valorant 58
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%

This is how Titan X Pascal and Pro Vega II compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega II is 19% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega II is 15% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega II is 12% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.89 40.58
Recency 2 August 2016 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 475 Watt

Titan X Pascal has 90% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has a 19.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.