RTX 2080 vs GTX 1080 Ti

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 1080 Ti
47.88

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 1% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6158
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Value for money27.5126.32
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP102Turing TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 February 2017 (7 years old)27 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $699
Current price$321 (0.5x MSRP)$426 (0.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Ti has 5% better value for money than RTX 2080.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842944
Core clock speed1481 MHz1515 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt215 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.4314.6
Floating-point performance11,340 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB8 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed11000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Readyno data+
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 47.88
RTX 2080 48.56
+1.4%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 1% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1080 Ti 18554
RTX 2080 18817
+1.4%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 1% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1080 Ti 37672
RTX 2080 40278
+6.9%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 7% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1080 Ti 27564
+54.8%
RTX 2080 17810

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 55% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1080 Ti 142490
RTX 2080 143576
+0.8%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 1% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1080 Ti 62051
RTX 2080 102127
+64.6%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 65% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1080 Ti 394694
RTX 2080 436117
+10.5%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 10% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 1080 Ti 86038
RTX 2080 103023
+19.7%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 20% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 1080 Ti 55161
RTX 2080 119410
+116%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 116% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1080 Ti 175
+16.6%
RTX 2080 150

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 17% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1080 Ti 68
RTX 2080 70
+3.4%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1080 Ti 10
RTX 2080 12
+19%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 19% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1080 Ti 105
RTX 2080 109
+3.4%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1080 Ti 60
+14.9%
RTX 2080 52

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 15% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1080 Ti 58
+29.3%
RTX 2080 45

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 29% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 175
+16.6%
RTX 2080 150

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 17% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 105
RTX 2080 109
+3.4%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 68
RTX 2080 70
+3.4%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 10
RTX 2080 12
+19%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 19% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 60
+14.9%
RTX 2080 52

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 15% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 58
+29.3%
RTX 2080 45

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by 29% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1080 Ti 148
RTX 2080 205
+38.9%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 39% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

GTX 1080 Ti 148
RTX 2080 205
+38.9%

RTX 2080 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 39% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129
−10.9%
143
+10.9%
1440p85
−18.8%
101
+18.8%
4K66
−7.6%
71
+7.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−1.1%
85−90
+1.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100
−5%
105
+5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
−18.1%
98
+18.1%
Battlefield 5 166
+1.8%
163
−1.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
−42.7%
187
+42.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−1.1%
85−90
+1.1%
Far Cry 5 120
+2.6%
117
−2.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 104
−1%
105
+1%
Forza Horizon 4 147
−6.1%
156
+6.1%
Hitman 3 150−160
−7.8%
165
+7.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−19.2%
124
+19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−74%
134
+74%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+0.8%
119
−0.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−27.9%
110
+27.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90
−1.1%
91
+1.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+0%
83
+0%
Battlefield 5 154
−0.6%
155
+0.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61
−166%
162
+166%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−1.1%
85−90
+1.1%
Far Cry 5 117
+4.5%
112
−4.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 145
−5.5%
153
+5.5%
Hitman 3 150−160
−5.9%
162
+5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+2%
102
−2%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65
−23.1%
80
+23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 113
−0.9%
114
+0.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
−39.2%
181
+39.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−14%
98
+14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+4.4%
68
−4.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+13.7%
73
−13.7%
Battlefield 5 149
+2.8%
145
−2.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−1.1%
85−90
+1.1%
Far Cry 5 109
+2.8%
106
−2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 94
+2.2%
92
−2.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120
−10%
132
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
−8.2%
106
+8.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+8.9%
79
−8.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
−20.9%
110
+20.9%
Hitman 3 90−95
−26.6%
119
+26.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−4.2%
74
+4.2%
Metro Exodus 56
−7.1%
60
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−26.8%
52
+26.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
−23.3%
90
+23.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+6.9%
58
−6.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−9.1%
60
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 118
−5.9%
125
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Far Cry 5 97
−2.1%
99
+2.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 88
−1.1%
89
+1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 102
−15.7%
118
+15.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−26.1%
58
+26.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
−25%
65
+25%
Hitman 3 50−55
−27.5%
65
+27.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+100%
21
−100%
Metro Exodus 35
−11.4%
39
+11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−25.9%
34
+25.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 41
−14.6%
47
+14.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−5.6%
76
+5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
−2.5%
41
+2.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−18.8%
38
+18.8%
Battlefield 5 70
−8.6%
76
+8.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
−7.3%
59
+7.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
−8.8%
62
+8.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75
−8%
81
+8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−34.6%
35
+34.6%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 2080 is 10.9% faster than GTX 1080 Ti

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 2080 is 18.8% faster than GTX 1080 Ti

4K resolution:

  • RTX 2080 is 7.6% faster than GTX 1080 Ti

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 100% faster than the RTX 2080.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 is 166% faster than the GTX 1080 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is ahead in 13 tests (19%)
  • RTX 2080 is ahead in 51 test (75%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 47.88 48.56
Recency 28 February 2017 27 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 215 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2080. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7822 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1921 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.