Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 1070 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5
17.96
+101%

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 101% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking287451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.912.38
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN17E-G2 Max-QGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 May 2017 (6 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$1244 $363

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 Max-Q has 148% better value for money than M2000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed1101 - 1215 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed1265 - 1379 MHz1197 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate176.543.92
Floating-point performance5,648 gflops1,405 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and Quadro M2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA6.15.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Max-Q 17.96
+101%
M2000M 8.95

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 101% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 6950
+101%
M2000M 3465

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 101% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 44090
+114%
M2000M 20567

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 114% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 18688
+263%
M2000M 5143

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 263% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 14679
+253%
M2000M 4157

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 253% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 99552
+234%
M2000M 29795

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 234% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 92
+159%
M2000M 36

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 159% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 48
M2000M 70
+46.9%

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q by 47% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 7
M2000M 33
+388%

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q by 388% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 63
+38.2%
M2000M 46

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 45
+13.9%
M2000M 40

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 14% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 34
+134%
M2000M 15

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 134% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 75
+243%
M2000M 22

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 243% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 75
+243%
M2000M 22

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 243% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 92
+159%
M2000M 36

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 159% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 63
+38.2%
M2000M 46

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 48
M2000M 70
+46.9%

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q by 47% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 7
M2000M 33
+388%

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q by 388% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 45
+13.9%
M2000M 40

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 14% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Max-Q 34
+134%
M2000M 15

GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q outperforms Quadro M2000M by 134% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+164%
36
−164%
4K41
+273%
11
−273%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+226%
18−20
−226%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Battlefield 5 81
+170%
30−33
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 81
+268%
21−24
−268%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+226%
30−35
−226%
Hitman 3 50−55
+132%
21−24
−132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+279%
18−20
−279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 57
+200%
18−20
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Battlefield 5 81
+170%
30−33
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 78
+255%
21−24
−255%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+213%
30−35
−213%
Hitman 3 50−55
+132%
21−24
−132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+232%
18−20
−232%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+313%
23
−313%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
+121%
18−20
−121%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Battlefield 5 75
+150%
30−33
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 75
+241%
21−24
−241%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+155%
30−35
−155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+264%
14
−264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Hitman 3 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Hitman 3 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+256%
9
−256%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+291%
10−12
−291%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

This is how GTX 1070 Max-Q and M2000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Max-Q is 164% faster than M2000M in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Max-Q is 273% faster than M2000M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 Max-Q is 400% faster than the M2000M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 Max-Q surpassed M2000M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.96 8.95
Recency 30 May 2017 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 55 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 65 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 443 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.