GeForce 320M vs GTX 1050 Ti

Place in performance ranking	309	1183
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.91	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code name	N17P-G1	MCP89
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 October 2016 (7 years ago)	1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	no data
Current price	$207 (1.5x MSRP)	$408

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce 320M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	32
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	23 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	66.82	7.200
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.36
+2930%

GeForce 320M 0.54

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms 320M by 2930% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti 6317
+2922%

GeForce 320M 209

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms 320M by 2922% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	53 +342%	12 −342%
1440p	30	0−1
4K	27	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

90−95
+2900%

3−4

−2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	800−850 +2863%	27−30 −2863%
Battlefield 5	1600−1650 +2919%	53 −2919%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Far Cry 5	1150−1200 +2926%	35−40 −2926%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	2050−2100 +2871%	69 −2871%
Hitman 3	60−65 +2900%	2−3 −2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +2817%	12−14 −2817%
Metro Exodus	1650−1700 +2846%	56 −2846%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1350−1400 +2900%	45−50 −2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +2900%	7−8 −2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	270−280 +2900%	9−10 −2900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	800−850 +2863%	27−30 −2863%
Battlefield 5	1300−1350 +2855%	44 −2855%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Far Cry 5	1050−1100 +2900%	35 −2900%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	2300−2350 +2887%	75−80 −2887%
Hitman 3	60−65 +2900%	2−3 −2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +2817%	12−14 −2817%
Metro Exodus	1350−1400 +2900%	45 −2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1350−1400 +2900%	45−50 −2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +2900%	7−8 −2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	270−280 +2900%	9−10 −2900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	800−850 +2863%	27−30 −2863%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Far Cry 5	800−850 +2863%	27 −2863%
Forza Horizon 4	1350−1400 +2900%	45 −2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +2817%	12−14 −2817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +2900%	7−8 −2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	270−280 +2900%	9−10 −2900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1350−1400

+2900%

45−50
−2900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	950−1000 +2869%	30−35 −2869%
Far Cry New Dawn	850−900 +2831%	29 −2831%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	500−550 +2841%	16−18 −2841%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	400−450 +2757%	14−16 −2757%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +2900%	4−5 −2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	900−950 +2803%	30−35 −2803%
Hitman 3	180−190 +2900%	6−7 −2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Metro Exodus	850−900 +2831%	29 −2831%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	900−950 +2900%	30 −2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	500−550 +2678%	18−20 −2678%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +2900%	10−11 −2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+2900%

3−4

−2900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	450−500 +2713%	16−18 −2713%
Far Cry New Dawn	350−400 +2817%	12−14 −2817%
Hitman 3	350−400 +2817%	12−14 −2817%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +2900%	10−11 −2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	450−500 +2713%	16−18 −2713%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	240−250 +2900%	8−9 −2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	240−250 +2900%	8−9 −2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Far Cry 5	270−280 +2900%	9−10 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +2900%	20 −2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +2900%	4−5 −2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +2900%	6−7 −2900%