Arc A750 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5 A550M 7 A730M 7 A770M 7 A780 A580 A750 A770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39

A750 outperforms M GL by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
Arc A750 Arc A750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.60
Power efficiency11.1210.32
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 22DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803584
Core clock speed931 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88537.6
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs80224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.39
Arc A750 30.16
+221%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3933
Samples: 328
Arc A750 12629
+221%
Samples: 1676

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−257%
107
+257%
1440p18−20
−233%
60
+233%
4K10−12
−260%
36
+260%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.70
1440pno data4.82
4Kno data8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−146%
140−150
+146%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−262%
120−130
+262%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−91.7%
270−280
+91.7%
Dota 2 65−70
−219%
220−230
+219%
Fortnite 55−60
−146%
140−150
+146%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−183%
99
+183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−262%
120−130
+262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−640%
185
+640%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−219%
220−230
+219%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−262%
120−130
+262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−176%
69
+176%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−146%
140−150
+146%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−125%
45
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−527%
69
+527%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 336
+0%
336
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 151
+0%
151
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+0%
270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+0%
112
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 144
+0%
144
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+0%
55
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 257% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 233% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 260% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 640% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A750 performs better in 14 tests (25%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (75%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.39 30.16
Recency 1 February 2018 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 246% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 221% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Arc A750 Arc A750
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
FirePro W8000 W8000
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Vega 8 Embedded Vega 8 Embedded
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
T1000 Mobile T1000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RX Vega 5 Vega 5
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
GeForce MX570 MX570
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Jetson T5000 Jetson T5000
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6300 XT RX 6300 XT
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6800X Duo
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5300M Pro 5300M
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
MX450 12W MX450 12W

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1069 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Arc A750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.