GeForce GTX 260 vs 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 Ultra and GeForce GTX 260, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800 Ultra
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 171 Watt
1.66

GTX 260 outperforms 8800 Ultra by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking936744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.020.14
Power efficiency0.691.24
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG80GT200
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2007 (17 years ago)16 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 260 has 600% better value for money than 8800 Ultra.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores612192
Core clock speed612 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt182 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate39.1736.86
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs2428
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mm267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB896 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800 Ultra 1.66
GTX 260 3.16
+90.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 Ultra 642
GTX 260 1218
+89.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 3.16
Recency 2 May 2007 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 182 Watt

8800 Ultra has 6.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 260, on the other hand, has a 90.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 Ultra in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 260

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 29 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 597 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.