GeForce 8800 Ultra vs GTX 275

Aggregated performance score

GTX 275
2009
896MB GDDR3
3.65
+120%

GTX 275 outperforms 8800 Ultra by 120% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking673895
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.350.03
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT200BG80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 January 2009 (15 years ago)2 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $829
Current price$82 (0.3x MSRP)$235 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 275 has 1067% better value for money than 8800 Ultra.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240128
CUDA cores240612
Core clock speed633 MHz612 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt171 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.6 billion/sec39.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance673.9 gflops387.1 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)270 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options++

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB512 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz1080 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s103.7 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.03.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 275 3.65
+120%
8800 Ultra 1.66

GTX 275 outperforms 8800 Ultra by 120% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 275 1414
+120%
8800 Ultra 642

GTX 275 outperforms 8800 Ultra by 120% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 3.65 1.66
Recency 15 January 2009 2 May 2007
Cost $249 $829
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 171 Watt

The GeForce GTX 275 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 Ultra in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 130 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.